I’ve spent the last three years reading theology and mystic texts and religious esoterica and I barely understand a word. Regrettably. It doesn’t help that I’m reading texts from a religious tradition that desperately wants to obfuscate meaning but I thought it might. I thought I might achieve some kind of runner’s high where the act of reading something so difficult broke open to a brief spell of lucidity and I could see something you could define as spiritual truth but it turns out you can’t read yourself into that.
Then why put it to words? I wondered. Why bother? What does anybody get out of theology? What do the theologists get? What does any God get?
With Urtext I tried to give form to frustration, form to the pretense that anything beyond ourselves can be understood at all. I tried to draft a limit-experience of sorts, a glimpse of the beyond that is not unfreindly but can’t welcome us or the way we learn and know. No matter how much we wish it could. It’s a loose adaptation of an obscure Jewish creation myth which abounds in strange imagery and deep empathy for creativity in itself. A myth that understands that one must withdraw to make the space to create.
Then why put it to words? I wondered. Why bother? What does anybody get out of theology? What do the theologists get? What does any God get?
With Urtext I tried to give form to frustration, form to the pretense that anything beyond ourselves can be understood at all. I tried to draft a limit-experience of sorts, a glimpse of the beyond that is not unfreindly but can’t welcome us or the way we learn and know. No matter how much we wish it could. It’s a loose adaptation of an obscure Jewish creation myth which abounds in strange imagery and deep empathy for creativity in itself. A myth that understands that one must withdraw to make the space to create.
This movie stars Simon Farrell and could star nobody else. This is the first time I ever wrote a part for someone (and I’m not sure if he knows that). When Simon is on screen, any screen, he is unignorable. There’s something about him, but I don’t think you’re supposed to use words to define presence. His is exhilirating.
This was the first time I ever worked with Luke Strahm, who shot the film, and I’m hooked. He understands the image intricately; what makes one seductive, how to create an illusion, how to find a detail you can obssess over. He is also, and this is important, a joy to be around.
What can I say about working with Sophia Biedka? I only want to from now on. She makes filmmaking seem rational. I think that’s a miracle.
This was the first time I ever worked with Luke Strahm, who shot the film, and I’m hooked. He understands the image intricately; what makes one seductive, how to create an illusion, how to find a detail you can obssess over. He is also, and this is important, a joy to be around.
What can I say about working with Sophia Biedka? I only want to from now on. She makes filmmaking seem rational. I think that’s a miracle.